Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1845

reference
47-tree-1
name
1845
tree-preservation-order

undefined

47-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035190 50.897998)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035134 50.897992,-1.035136 50.898003,-1.035144 50.898013,-1.035157 50.898021,-1.035172 50.898026,-1.035190 50.898028,-1.035207 50.898027,-1.035223 50.898022,-1.035236 50.898014,-1.035244 50.898004,-1.035247 50.897993,-1.035245 50.897982,-1.035237 50.897972,-1.035225 50.897964,-1.035209 50.897958,-1.035191 50.897956,-1.035174 50.897958,-1.035158 50.897963,-1.035145 50.897971,-1.035137 50.897981,-1.035134 50.897992)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL